Health & Safety Archives

December 17, 2019

Preventable Tragedy? Atrium Court Apartment Fire, Phoenix, Claims 4-Year-Old Child, Three Others Injured.

Phoenix Apartment Fire Leaves Child Fatally Injured, Three Others Injured. (Fox10Phoenix.com)

Could the death and injuries from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family and other victims. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

An apartment fire in Phoenix, Arizona early Sunday morning, December 15, 2019, tragically claimed the life of one child and left three others injured.

As reported by Fox10Phoenix.com, “[f]ire crews responded to an apartment complex near 23rd and Dunlap Avenues to find a second-alarm fire and people trapped on the second floor.”

According to the report, “[w]hen firefighters did their initial search, a 4-year-old girl was found dead.”

TheState.com is reporting, with the three individuals that were rescued “the woman was in critical condition from burns and smoke inhalation. The man and 10-year-old girl were in serious but stable condition.”

AzFamily.com and @ArizonaNewsnet have identified the apartment complex at the “Atrium Court” apartments.

The cause of the fire is under investigation.

Our Legal Take

As the fire department continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous inspections?
Was the property owner aware of any inadequate fire safety measures present prior to the fire?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the family of the deceased victim may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their loss and suffering. In addition, an injured victims may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their injuries and suffering.

As insurance companies and unscrupulous property owners are often concerned with limiting their financial exposure in these incidents, it is crucial that the family of the deceased victim and any injured victims retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and the family’s and any victims best interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

November 27, 2019

Fire Safety Negligence? Salem, VA Apartment Fire Leaves One Woman in Critical Condition.

by The Murray Law Firm

Salem, VA Apartment Fire Leaves One Woman in Critical Condition. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Could the injuries from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

A fire engulfed a Salem, Virginia apartment building Wednesday morning, November 20, 2019, leaving one woman in critical condition.

As reported by WDBJ7.com, “first responding units arrived within four minutes of a call to an apartment at 121 Rutledge Drive and found a first-floor property on fire.”

According to the report, “[a] woman in the space was found unconscious and removed within seven minutes of the firefighters arriving.”

WSET.com is reporting, “emergency lifesaving CPR began immediately and firefighters were able to get the woman’s pulse back quickly.”

The woman was taken to the hospital by a Salem Fire and EMS ambulance.

The Salem Fire Marshal’s Office “has determined that the fire was caused by improper disposal of smoking materials and said the fire was an accident,” according to the media report.

Our Legal Take

As the state fire marshal continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to the injuries in this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous inspections?
Was the property owner aware of any inadequate fire safety measures present prior to the fire?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the victim may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their injuries and suffering. Financial recovery for such a claim could be substantial.

As insurance companies and unscrupulous property owners are often more concerned with limiting their financial exposure in these incidents, it is crucial that the victims retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and the victim best interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

November 20, 2019

Fire Safety Negligence? Denver, CO Apartment Fire Leaves One Man Dead.

by The Murray Law Firm

Denver, CO Apartment Fire Leaves One Man Dead. (DenverPost.com)

Could the death from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

An apartment fire in Denver, Colorado early Wednesday night, November 20, 2019, tragically claimed the life of one man.

As reported by DenverPost.com, “[f]irefighters were called about 12:45 a.m. to the two-story building at the intersection of Denver Place and Federal Boulevard to find flames and smoke shooting into the sky.”

KDVR.com is reporting, “[a] man…was in the window when residents of the building who already had escaped tried to move a ladder into position so he could get down. But the [man] lost his balance and fell to the sidewalk.”

According to the report, “[f]irefighters performed CPR on the man but he was pronounced dead at the scene.”

Three people were treated for smoke inhalation at the scene, according to media reports.

Investigators with Denver Fire and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are looking into the cause of the fire.

Our Legal Take

As the fire department continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous inspections?
Was the property owner aware of any inadequate fire safety measures present prior to the fire?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the family of the deceased victim may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their loss and suffering. Financial recovery for such a claim could be substantial.

As insurance companies and unscrupulous property owners are often more concerned with limiting their financial exposure in these incidents, it is crucial that the family of the deceased victim retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and the the family’s best interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

November 1, 2019

Fire Safety Negligence? Jill Whitlatch Tragically Killed in Charlestown, IN Apartment Fire.

by The Murray Law Firm

Jill Whitlatch Passes in Charlestown, IN Apartment Fire. (WDRB.com)

Could the death from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

A fire engulfed a Charlestown, Indiana apartment building early Thursday morning, October 31, 2019, leaving one woman dead and three other families displaced.

According to WDRB.com, “The Charlestown Fire Department was called to…Apartments on Maple Drive about 5:30 a.m. on Thursday.”

Firefighters arrived at the apartment building that holds four units and found one apartment engulfed in flames.

NewsandTribune.com is reporting, “[t]hree families were evacuated from the building, partly due to neighbors and first responders knocking on doors and yelling to wake them up at the early morning hour.”

According to the report, “firefighters searched each of the four units; in one, they found a woman who had succumbed to the fire.”

NewsandTribune.com identified the deceased woman as “57-year-old Jill Whitlatch.”

The Indiana State Fire Marshal, Charlestown Fire and Police Departments are investigating the cause of the fire according to the media reports.

Our Legal Take

As the state fire marshal continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous inspections?
Was the property owner aware of any inadequate fire safety measures present prior to the fire?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the family of Jill Whitlatch may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their loss and suffering. Financial recovery for such a claim could be substantial.

As insurance companies and unscrupulous property owners are often more concerned with limiting their financial exposure in these incidents, it is crucial that the victims retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and the the family’s best interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

August 27, 2019

Preventable Tragedy? Bristol at Sunset Apartments Fire Leaves Two People Dead, One Injured.

by The Murray Law Firm

The Bristol at Sunset Apartments Fire Leaves Two People Dead, One Injured. (ReviewJournal.com)

Could the deaths from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victims families? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

A fire engulfed a Henderson, Nevada apartment building early Saturday morning, August 24, 2019, leaving two people dead and another person injured.

As reported by 8NewsNow.com, “[t]he Henderson Fire Department responded at about 1:20 a.m….to an apartment unit on fire at 2001 Ramrod Ave., near East Sunset Road and Mountain Vista Street.”

According to ReviewJournal.com, “[t]wo people died and another was injured in the fire at The Bristol at Sunset apartments.”

A man and a woman were taken to Henderson Hospital, where they later succumbed to their injuries.

Another man was taken to University Medical Center and treated for smoke inhalation.

Three dogs also died in the fire.

Residents of the complex told the Review-Journal that “they don’t have sprinklers in their units” and one resident told the Review-Journal that “she heard no alarms early Saturday.”

The fire remains under investigation.

Our Legal Take

As the fire department continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous fires or safety inspections?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the families of the victims who perished may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their loss. In addition, any injured victims may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their injuries. Financial recovery for such a claim could be substantial.

It is crucial that the victims and the families of those who perished retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and their interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property fire.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

July 29, 2019

Fire Safety Negligence? Calloway Cove Apartments Fire, Jacksonville, Leaves Multiple People Injured.

by The Murray Law Firm

Fire at Calloway Cove Apartments, Jacksonville, Leaves Multiple People Injured. (ActionNewsJax.com)

Could the injuries from this apartment fire have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victims? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Local News

A fire engulfed a Jacksonville, Florida apartment building Tuesday night, July 23, 2019, leaving multiple people injured and tenants searching for housing.

According to ActionNewsJax.com, “Jacksonville Fire and Rescue Department…responded to an apartment fire in the 4200 block of Moncrief Road on Tuesday around 8:30 p.m.”

All of building G at Calloway Cove was damaged in the fire, according to the report.

Seven people were injured in fire. Jacksonville.com is reporting, “four of the seven sent to hospitals were in critical condition Tuesday night, the others in stable condition.”

The Complex was inspected by the State Fire Marshal’s Office on Friday, July 26, and according to News4Jax.com, “[t]here were eight noted fire code violations in the inspection, including a failure to provide appropriate carbon monoxide monitoring and installation in the complex, and failure to provide working smoke detectors throughout the facility.

The state fire marshal has not determined the official cause of the fire according to the media reports.

Our Legal Take

As the state fire marshal continues its investigation, premises liability attorneys with The Murray Law Firm question whether a lack of fire safety measures at the complex may have contributed to this incident.

What fire safety measures, such as working smoke detectors, fire sprinklers and emergency exits, were in place and working at the time of the fire?
When was the last fire inspection performed on the property?
Were any safety measures added after any previous inspections?
Was the property owner aware of any inadequate fire safety measures present prior to the fire?

As details of this fire continue to emerge, The Murray Law Firm suggests that it is possible that the apartment complex failed to undertake proper safety measures to protect those residents and guests legally on the premises. Under certain State law, the owner and management company of an apartment complex have a duty to protect residents and to keep the premises safe. If the owner or manager fails in this duty, they may be held civilly liable for any injuries or wrongful deaths that occur as a consequence. Should the apartment complex be found at fault, the victims may elect to hold the owner and management company civilly liable for their injuries and suffering. Financial recovery for such a claim could be substantial.

As insurance companies and unscrupulous property owners are often more concerned with limiting their financial exposure in these incidents, it is crucial that the victims retain an experienced premises liability firm as soon as possible to ensure all evidence, such as a faulty fire alarm or a poor evacuation plan, is preserved and the victims best interests are protected. The Murray Law Firm has extensive experience in premises liability and apartment negligence cases, such as this, and we offer our legal expertise, if needed.

If anyone has information to share, or if anyone is seeking information regarding this incident, please contact us at 888.842.1616.

Our Results

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars for its Clients, and recently secured a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

July 2, 2019

Product Defect? Efren Perez-Sanchez Killed When Pressure Washer Tank Explodes at Orem, Utah Greenhouse.

by The Murray Law Firm

Efren Perez-Sanchez Killed When Pressure Washer Tank Explodes at Orem, Utah Greenhouse. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Was safety negligence or an equipment malfunction a factor in this loss of life and could it have been prevented? Read ‘Our Legal Take’ below to find out if the victim’s family may have legal avenues for justice and claims for substantial compensation.

Orem News

Orem, Utah police are investigating after an air tank explosion killed a man while he was working, Thursday morning, June 27, 2019. According to KSL.com, “[a] man was using a tank to help spray plants at [a] Farm and Greenhouse, located at 1600 North 1545 West in Orem, around 8:30 a.m. Thursday…[t]he tank failed and exploded, killing the man.” ABC4.com has identified the man as “Efren Perez-Sanchez of Lindon.” The incident is still under investigation.

Read Our Legal Take below to learn whether Mr. Perez-Sanchez’s family may have an avenue to justice.

Our Legal Take

Greenhouse employees, vendors and guests have a right to safety and security while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the safety measures provided both at the greenhouse and by the manufacturer of the air tank, and whether this tragic incident may have been prevented. Relevant factual and legal inquires include, but are not limited to:

What air tank safety features, such as an alarm or emergency shut off, were in place to protect Mr. Perez-Sanchez?
Did any such safety features fail?
Was the tragedy a result of a catastrophic equipment malfunction?
Was the manufacturer or property owner aware of the potential safety risks to employees?
Were any attempts made to service, recall or replace the air tank prior to the incident?

Under Workers’ Compensation laws, our legal team suggests that the family of Efren Perez-Sanchez will most likely be entitled to significant compensation as a result of this accident. While Mr. Long’s family should be eligible for benefits under workers compensation laws, they may also hold a substantial third-party civil claim against the designer or manufacturer of the air tank. Based on its history and experience in representing families in workers compensation and product liability claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that Mr. Perez-Sanchez’s family should retain legal counsel without delay so as to ensure that all evidence connected to the incident is preserved.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS

The Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for individuals who have been hurt, or families whose loved ones have been lost, in a work accidents and as a consequence of an unsafe property. We have obtained well over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for the family of a worker who lost his life at an unsafe property as consequence of a product defect. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 24, 2019

Preventable Incident? Mattew Lu Tragically Killed in Gastonia, NC Trampoline Park Accident.

by The Murray Law Firm

12-Year-Old Boy Fatally Injured in Gastonia Rock Wall Climbing Accident. (WSOCtv.com)

Did safety negligence contribute to the tragic loss of a young boy and are justice and compensation available to his family?

Gastonia News

A 12-year-old boy has tragically died after falling from a climbing feature at a trampoline park in Gaston County, North Carolina Wednesday night, June 19, 2019, according to WSOCtv.com. Fox46Charlotte.com is reporting, “[t]he accident occurred…as the child was climbing a rock wall at [a] Trampoline Park located at 3940 E Franklin Blvd. in Gastonia.” Per the report, “[a]ccording to the 911 call log with Gaston County…the child was breathing abnormally after falling about 15 feet from the wall.” The boy was rushed to Levine Children’s Hospital in Charlotte, but was sadly unable to revover from his injuries. Fox46Charolette.com has identified the young child as “Matthew Lu.”

“There are several states that regulate trampoline parks or have proposed such action, but North Carolina is not one of them,” according to WSOCtv.com. Fox46Charlotte.com is reporting, “according to the NC Department of Labor, trampoline parks are excluded from the Amusement Device Safety Act and therefore are not regulated by the NCDOL, Elevator and Amusement Device Bureau.”

The investigation is ongoing according to the media outlets.

Our Legal Take

Entertainment complex patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of safety provided on the property and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have there been prior injuries on the property?
Was the victim secured in a climbing harness and, if so, was it properly secured prior to the accident
Was there a sufficiently padded mat at the base of the climbing wall?
Was there a medical emergency protocol in place and, if so, was it followed by employees?
What inspection protocol does the establishment have for its entertainment features?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the business owner or management failed to provide adequate safety and procedures to protect those on its premises, the family of the young Mattew Lu may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling safety negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent safety case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of safety negligence, including at entertainment complexes that cater to families and young children. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 12, 2019

Justice Available? Kiersten Symone Smith Fatally Injured, 5 other injured victims in Dallas Crane Collapse.

by The Murray Law Firm

Kiersten Symone Smith Fatally Injured, 5 other injured victims in Dallas Crane Collapse. (KIRO7.com)

Was safety negligence or an equipment malfunction a factor in this tragic loss of life and could it have been prevented? Read ‘Our Legal Take’ below to find out if Ms. Smith’s family may have legal avenues for justice and claims for substantial compensation.

Dallas News

A construction crane collapsed on a Dallas, Texas apartment building during a violent wind storm Sunday, June 9, 2019, killing one woman and injuring 5 other people. According to DallasNews.com, “[i]nvestigators with the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration were working with Bigge Crane and Rigging to figure out how to remove its fallen apparatus and determine what caused the accident.” Latimes.com is reporting, “[t]he crane fell around 2 p.m. as storms ripped across parts of Oklahoma and Texas, bringing high winds, heavy rain and hail that flooded streets and caused power outages.” 5 people were injured, “[t]he 29-year-old woman who died has been identified as Kiersten Symone Smith,” DallasNews.com is reporting.

Per news reports, the owner of the crane has allegedly been cited for violations in the past. According to DFW.CBSlocal.com, “[i]n the past decade, OSHA has cited the…owner of the crane that collapsed killing a woman in Dallas Sunday, with 17 safety violations.”

Read Our Legal Take below to learn whether Kiersten Smith’s family, as well as any other injured victims, may have an avenue to justice.

Our Legal Take

Moving large, heavy loads is crucial to today’s manufacturing and construction industries. Much technology has been developed for these operations, including careful training and extensive safety precautions and procedures. When operated with a focus on safety, cranes are vital pieces of equipment. When they’re used or maintained carelessly, they can be a serious hazard to people and property. The Murray Law Firm questions the safety measures provided by the owner of the crane, and whether this tragic incident may have been prevented. Relevant factual and legal inquires include, but are not limited to:

Was the crane installed properly?
Was the crane properly prepared for a severe weather system?
Was the crane up to date on certifications?
Were operating functions checked daily to ensure that everything is working properly and that there are no defects or cracks in the support members?
Were any attempts made to service, repair, or replace the crane prior to the incident?

Generally, crane owners are required to protect all from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the crane owner failed to provide adequate safety measures to protect individuals from foreseeable harm, the family of the Kiersten Symone Smith may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for her wrongful death. In addition, any other injured victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries and suffering.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling safety negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent safety case, it is imperative that Kiersten Symone Smith’s family and any other injured victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of safety negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

December 20, 2018

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney

by The Murray Law Firm

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

A LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

DISCLAIMERS:

The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.

The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.

“Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.