Parking Lot Crime Archives

June 6, 2019

Longhorn Steakhouse Parking Lot Shooting, Clarksville, Leaves Two Dead; Preventable Tragedy?

Two Killed in Shooting at Clarksville Restaurant. (NewsChannel5.com)

Could this shooting have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victims? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Clarksville News

Gunfire erupted at a Clarksville, Tennessee restaurant Wednesday evening, June 5, 2019, leaving two people dead. According to NewsChannel5.com, “[p]olice found the victims in the parking lot of the Longhorn Steakhouse on Wilma Rudolph Boulevard around 8:30 p.m.” Both victims were taken to the hospital where they later succumbed to their injuries according to the report. Fox17.com is reporting, “[p]olice say the shooting followed a dispute of some sort.”

The incident remains under investigation.

Our Legal Take

Restaurant and patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided in the subject parking lot is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
What security measures, such as bright lighting, visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting?
Was the parking lot operator aware of the dispute prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the parking lot owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victims retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 16, 2019

William Walker, Charles Reeves II, Killed in Indianapolis Gentleman’s Nightclub Shooting; Justice and Compensation Available to the Families?

by The Murray Law Firm

William Walker, Charles Reeves, Killed in Indianapolis Gentleman’s Nightclub Shooting. (Fox59.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this Indianapolis gentleman’s club shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victims families?

LOCAL NEWS

A shooting at an Indianapolis, Indiana gentleman’s club left two men dead, early Saturday morning, May 11, 2019. According to Fox59.com, “Indianapolis Metro Police Department confirmed two people were shot at Club Venus, a nightclub located near the intersection of N. Tibbs Avenue and W. 16th. Street…[t]he shooting happened just after 1 a.m.” Both victims were pronounced dead at the scene and have been identified as “William Walker, age 23, and Charles Reeves II, age 42,” According to the news report. A motive and suspects have not been identified, and the incident remains under investigation. Over the past few years, multiple shootings have occurred at Club Venus. WRAL.com reported on a shooting at Club Venus from April 2018, WISHtv.com reported on a shooting from June 2017 and Fox59.com reported on a shooting from August 2017.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the nightclub and whether this assault may have been prevented.

Did the establishment make any security changes after any prior incidents of violence on the property?
What security measures, such as visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the incident?
Does the establishment have any protocol to check for deadly weapons prior to patrons entering the facility?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the nightclub owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of William Walker and Charles Reeves II may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of William Walker and Charles Reeves II retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence and their families. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 8, 2019

Coffee Creek Apartments Shooting Injures One; Justice Available for the Victim?

by The Murray Law Firm

One Man Injured in Coffee Creek Apartments Shooting. (News9.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at an Edmond apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Edmond, Oklahoma apartment complex Saturday evening, May 4, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to KFOR.com, “just before 6:15 p.m., officers were called to the Coffee Creek apartments near 15th and Fretz…when they arrived on scene they found one victim with multiple gunshot wounds to the stomach.” The condition and identity of the victim is unknown according to the report. The news story reports that the suspect “called 911, stating he wanted to turn himself in…was found on the south side of the complex hiding behind a bush.” It is reported that “an argument over property is what led up to the shooting.” The suspect was booked “on a complaint of shooting with intent to kill and possessing a firearm after a conviction of a felony,” according to the media report.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
Was the suspect a resident of the complex? How was the suspect able to gain access on to the property?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 7, 2019

Margaret Danielle Blanding, Ezquiel Estrich Killed in Anderson Apartment Complex Shooting; Security Failure?

by The Murray Law Firm

Margaret Danielle Blanding, Ezquiel Estrich Killed in Anderson Apartment Complex Shooting. (WYFF$.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the loss of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at an Anderson, South Carolina apartment complex early Friday morning, May 3, 2019, tragically leaving a young man and woman dead. According to WYFF4.com, “[t]he shooting was reported Friday about 1:20 a.m. at the Fairview Gardens Apartments off Williamson Road in Anderson.” The news report identified the victims as “Margaret Danielle Blanding, 18, and Ezquiel Estrich, 23.” According to the report, “Blanding’s body was found outside the apartments and Estrich’s body was found inside an apartment.” WSPA.com is reporting, “the shooting [suspects] fled the scene and led officers on a high-speed chase into Hart County, Georgia…the chase ended when the suspect car started to spark. [The suspects] surrendered and were taken into custody by Anderson Police.”

WSPA.com reported on a shooting at this apartment complex in March 2019.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

How were the suspects able to gain access on to the property?
How many prior incidents of violence have happened on the property and were any security improvements made after those incidents?
What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 3, 2019

Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez, Innocent Bystander, Killed in Lansdowne Shopping Center Shooting; Justice Available?

by The Murray Law Firm

Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez, Innocent Bystander, Killed in Lansdowne Shopping Center Shooting. (BaltimoreSun.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this tragic shopping center shooting death and are justice and compensation available to the family of Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted outside a Lansdowne, Maryland shopping center on Thursday afternoon, May 2, 2019, leaving one woman dead. According to BaltimoreSun.com, “a woman was killed Thursday after she was struck by a bullet intended for someone else during an altercation at Lansdowne Shopping Center.” Patch.com is reporting “[t]he suspected gunman fired toward at least one other man across the parking lot in front of Save Mart in the 3900 block of Hollins Ferry Road…[a]fter the shooting, the suspect left the scene.” According to the news report “Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez, 78, of…Halethorpe, was identified as the deceased.”

Police are currently searching for the suspects according to media reports.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Shopping center patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the shopping center and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
Did the shopping center have any reports of suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
What security measures, such as monitored surveillance cameras and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the family of Isabel Villalobos V De Vasquez retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims and their families and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

April 30, 2019

PT’s Showclub Assault Leaves One Dead, Three Others Injured; Justice Available?

by The Murray Law Firm

Gruesome Beating at PT’s Showclub Leaves One Dead, Three Others Injured. (Westword.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this senseless Denver gentleman’s club beating and are justice and compensation available to the victims?

LOCAL NEWS

A deadly assault at a Denver, Colorado gentleman’s club left one man dead and three other people injured, Sunday afternoon, April 28, 2019. According to Westword.com, “At least one person is dead and another is in critical condition after an assault at PT’s Showclub, at 1601 West Evans Avenue.” The news story reports “[f]our victims were transported to the hospital for blunt force injuries on their heads and bodies; a woman remains in critical condition and two more were released. Police have not released their identities or the name of the man who died.” DenverPost.com is reporting, “When police responded to the scene shortly before 1 p.m., [the suspect] was in the parking lot near one of the victims, who was on the ground and seriously injured…[o]fficers shocked [the suspect] with a Taser and took him into custody after he did not comply with their demands.”

A motive for the attack is not clear at this time according to media reports.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Club patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the club and whether this assault may have been prevented.

Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
What security measures, such as visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the incident?
Was the suspect inside the establishment prior to the assault?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the strip club owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries. Additionally, the family of the deceased victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims and family of the deceased victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence and their families. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

April 26, 2019

Latarica Stripling Killed in Memphis Apartment Complex Shooting; Preventable Tragedy?

by The Murray Law Firm

Latarica Stripling Killed in Crescent Bluff Apartments Shooting.

Latarica Stripling Killed in Memphis Apartment Complex Shooting. (WMCActionNews5.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this shooting death at a Memphis apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the family of Latarica Stripling?

MEMPHIS NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Memphis, Tennessee apartment complex Thursday night, April 25, 2019, leaving one woman dead. According to WREG.com, “[p]olice said they got a call of shots fired at the Crescent Bluff Apartments at Florida Street and E.H. Crump at 11:06 p.m., and when they got to the scene, they found a woman dead from injuries from a shooting.” The news outlet reports that the “[f]amily later identified the woman as Latarica Stripling.” The investigation is ongoing and no suspect information has been released according to the media outlet.

WMCactionNews5.com reported on an armed carjacking in this area in January 2015.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
If any prior incidents of violence did occur, did the property owner make any security changes?
What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Fields and others at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Latarica Stripling may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the family of Latarica Stripling retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

April 22, 2019

Olivia Katelyn Cunningham Killed, John Marr Injured in Sevierville Shopping Center Shooting; Justice Available?

by The Murray Law Firm

Olivia Katelyn Cunningham Killed, John Marr Injured in Tanger Outlets Sevierville Shopping Center Shooting

Olivia Katelyn Cunningham Killed, John Marr Injured in Sevierville Shopping Center Shooting. (WVLT.tv)

Did negligent security contribute to this shopping center shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victims?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted outside a Sevierville, Tennessee shopping center on Tuesday afternoon, April 16, 2019, leaving two people dead and one injured. According to KnoxNews.com, “[o]fficers descended on…an outlet mall…after several people called 911 to report a shooting outside the [a] store at 3:49 p.m.” The news story reports “[a] man with a gun walked up…and opened fire outside a store, killing a woman and wounding a man before turning the gun on himself.” Authorities identified the victims, “24-year-old Olivia Katelyn Cunningham of York, Pennsylvania…The male victim, 75-year old John Marr of Templeton, Massachusetts, was taken to the University of Tennessee Medical Center.” WVLT.tv reports on the deceased shooters criminal history which “includes multiple theft, burglary, and aggravated burglary charges dating back to 2015…[and] a violation of probation charge against him from November 2017.” According to the media reports, it is believed that the shooter did not know the victims.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Shopping center patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the shopping center and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
Did the shopping center have any reports of suspicious activity prior to the attempted carjacking?
What security measures, such as monitored surveillance cameras and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Ms. Cunningham and Mr. Marr at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Olivia Katelyn Cunningham may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss. Additionally, John Marr may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the John Marr and the family of Olivia Katelyn Cunningham retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims and their families and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

April 16, 2019

Breaux Bridge apartment Shooting Leaves Teenage Girl Injured; Justice Available?

by The Murray Law Firm

Breaux Bridge Apartments Shooting Leaves Teenage Girl Injured. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Breaux Bridge apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Breaux Bridge, Louisiana apartment complex Sunday morning, April 14, 2019, leaving one teen girl injured. According to TheAdvocate.com, the teenage girl was shot “Sunday in the parking lot of Breaux Bridge Apartments at 220 Margaret St.” The news story reports that the victim “received treatment at St. Martin Hospital and is in stable condition.” KATC.com is reporting “the 16-year-old victim was with four other teenage girls when she was shot,” no others were injured. A suspect was arrested and charged according to the media outlets.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
How was the suspect able to gain access on to the property?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for her injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

April 9, 2019

Man Killed in Glendale, Arizona Bar Shooting; Lapse in Security?

by The Murray Law Firm

Man Killed in La Rubia Y La Morena Bar Shooting.

Man Killed in Glendale Bar Shooting. (ABC15.com)

Could the death from a shooting at a Glendale bar have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

Local News

Gunfire rang out at a Glendale, Arizona bar early Saturday morning, April 6, 2019, leaving one man dead. According to 12News.com, “Glendale police officers responded to reports of shots being fired in the area of 67th Avenue and Bethany Home Road, when they arrived at the scene, the found an injured man.” ABC15.com reports “[t]he shooting occurred outside La Rubia Y La Morena Bar, also known as RM Bar, around 2:30 a.m.” After police found the injured man “they attempted life-saving measures on the shooting victim; however, the adult male who was shot did not survive his injuries.”

The media reports indicate that no suspect has been identified at this time.

Our Legal Take

Bar and nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided on the property and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Were security measures, such as bright lighting, surveillance cameras, security personnel, and security patrol in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Does the nightclub have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on the premises, the victim’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

Our Results: We’ve Obtained Over $100 Million in Verdicts and Settlements for our Clients

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.