Articles Posted in Parking Lot Crime

Demetrius Stewart Killed in Richmond Heights Tropicana Bowling Alley Shooting.

Demetrius Stewart, Innocent Victim, Killed in Richmond Heights Bowling Alley Shooting. (KSDK.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the senseless fatal shooting of Demetrius Stewart at a Richmond Heights, MO bowling alley and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted late Friday night in a bowling alley parking lot in Richmond Heights. According to whnt.com, Richmond Heights police “responded to the Tropicana Bowling Lanes around 11:20 p.m. because of a fight. When they arrived, they discovered the fight started as an argument in the bowling alley before [those involved] took it outside to the parking lot.”

Police report that the victim “was an innocent bystander” and was shot “while he was sitting in his car,” per ksdk.com.  Fox2news.com reports that “[f]amily and friends are still trying to come to terms with the senseless death of 45-year-old Demetrius Stewart. He was an active member of Alpha phi Alpha and an ordained minister.”

The shooter has apparently been arrested and charged.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Bowling alley patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the establishment and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • Were any efforts made to safely and separately remove all those involved in the initial altercation from the premises prior to an escalation to gunfire? 
  • Were police called at the start of the initial dispute?
  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as weapons screenings, visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the bowling alley owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Demetrius Stewart’ family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death. 

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Iesha Edwards Fatally Shot at Lexington, KY Nightclub

Iesha Edwards Fatally Shot at Lexington, KY Nightclub (WKYT)

Lexington, KY – January 26, 2019

Did negligent security contribute to the senseless death of Iesha Edwards at a Lexington, KY nightclub shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s Family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted early Saturday morning at The Fox Club in Lexington, KY.  WBKO is reporting that “Lexington police officers saw several people fighting outside The Fox Club and 27-year-old Iesha Edwards lying on the ground early Saturday.”  Iesha Edwards was later pronounced dead at a hospital.

According to WKYT, ‘Police said it all started with a fight inside the club that then moved outside. Witnesses told police during the fight outside, a man began shooting.”

No suspect has been identified.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the club and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • Were any efforts made to safely and separately remove all those involved in the initial altercation from the premises prior to an escalation to gunfire? 
  • Were police called at the start of the initial dispute?
  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as weapons screenings, visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the night club owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Iesha Edwards’ family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for her wrongful death. 

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence and their families.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Joseph Anthony Pintucci Killed in Dallas Parking Garage Shooting

Joseph Anthony Pintucci, 18, Killed in Dallas Parking Garage Shooting (CBS DFW)

Did negligent security contribute to the tragic loss of this young man and are justice and compensation available to Mr. Pintucci’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Security measures are under scrutiny following the tragic death of 18-year-old Joseph Anthony Pintucci, killed in a Dallas shopping center parking garage Thursday evening, January 24, 2019.

According to CBS DFW, gunfire erupted shortly after 10 p.m. “on the upper level of the Shops at Park Lane parking garage, just outside Dick’s Sporting Goods.”  Mr. Pintucci was transported to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, where he tragically succumbed to his injuries.

Dallas police have since made an arrest in connection with the shooting, per NBC 5 reports.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Store and parking garage patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the parking facility and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as bright lighting, monitored surveillance cameras, clear sight lines, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Pintucci at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the mall or parking garage owners or management failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Joseph Anthony Pintucci’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims and their families and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Patrick Alonzo Alston Killed in North Charlotte Gas Station Shooting

Patrick Alonzo Alston Killed in North Charlotte Gas Station Shooting (WSOCTV)

Did negligent security contribute to this tragic loss of life and are justice and compensation available to Mr. Alston’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted outside a North Charlotte Gas Station on January 27, 2019.  WSOCTV is reporting, “Officers responded to the shooting just after 6:30 p.m. outside the [a] gas station on Mallard Creek Road.”

According to the Charlotte Observer, “The man killed Sunday evening in the University City area of Charlotte has been identified as 36-year-old Patrick Alonzo Alston.”

A suspect has not been named. The investigation of Mr. Alston’s death marked Charlotte’s 11th homicide investigation this month according to WSOCTV.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Gas station patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the gas station and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as bright lighting, monitored surveillance cameras, clear windows, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Alston at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the gas station owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Patrick Alonzo Alston’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims and their families and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Robin Pierre Moore Injured in Freewayz Sports Bar Shooting

Robin Pierre Moore Injured in Freewayz Sports Bar Shooting (FOX 8)

Asheboro, NC – January 27, 2019

Did negligent security contribute to this senseless Asheboro sports bar shooting and are justice and compensation available to Robin Pierre Moore?

LOCAL NEWS

Security measures are in question after 43-year-old Robin Pierre Moore was shot and injured at an Asheboro sports bar Sunday morning, January 27, 2019.

According to The Courier-Tribune, “officers responded to a reported assault in the parking lot of Freewayz Sports Bar & Lounge, located at 1512 Zoo Parkway, Asheboro.”  The news report indicates that a victim of the incident “Robin Pierre Moore, 43, is said to be in stable condition at an unnamed hospital.”

Police told FOX 8, “multiple fights in the parking lot” escalated into gunfire.  Mr. Moore was transported to the hospital with a “gunshot wound to the chest.”

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Bar and nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the lounge and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What parking lot security measures, such as bright lighting, visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Moore at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the bar owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Robin Pierre Moore may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence and their families.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Dover, N.H. – December 18, 2018

Did negligent security contribute to the senseless loss of this young man and are justice and compensation available to Raymond Eldridge’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Security measures are in question following the fatal shooting of 34-year-old Raymond Eldridge II, who was fatally shot outside a Dover restaurant Tuesday, December 18, 2018.

Raymond Eldridge Castaways Shooting

Raymond Eldridge Castaways Shooting (Google Maps)

According to WMUR, gunfire erupted “outside Castaways Restaurant & Lounge at 31 Cocheco St.” around 10 p.m. Mr. Eldridge succumbed to fatal injuries.

The tragedy “has come as a shock to the Dover community,” where The New Hampshire Union Leader reports, Mr. Eldridge attended high school and was “beloved by friends.”

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Restaurant and parking lot patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the lounge and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • What security measures, such as weapons screenings, monitored surveillance cameras, bright parking lot lighting, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Eldridge at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the restaurant or parking lot owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Raymond Eldridge II may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Destiny Dennis, Jacksonville Gas Station Shooting

Destiny Dennis, Jacksonville Shooting (Action News JAX)

Did negligent security contribute to the senseless loss of this Little Rock mother and are justice and compensation available to Ms. Dennis’ family?

LOCAL NEWS

21-year-old Destiny Dennis was shot and killed during an apparent robbery at a Jacksonville gas station January 4, 2019.

Ms. Dennis’ mother told First Coast News,  her daughter was inside a car with her six-month-old child when “someone came to the car and was going to rob them.” Tragically, Ms. Dennis was fatally shot in the subsequent gunfire.

According to Action News JAX, Ms. Dennis “leaves behind nine brothers, and one sister, in addition to her daughter.” Her family is now searching for answers and justice.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Gas station patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the gas station and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as bright lighting, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect Ms. Dennis at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the gas station owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Destiny Dennis’ family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

https://www.legal-chronicle.com/files/2019/01/Screen-Shot-2019-01-15-at-11.45.48-PM-300x197.png

(AZ Family)

Phoenix, AZ – January 13, 2019

Did negligent security contribute to this tragic Phoenix motel shooting and are justice and compensation available to Ms. Perry’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

18-year-old Fiasia Perry was shot and killed “at the Payless Inn near 25th Street and Van Buren” Sunday, January 13, 2019, according to FOX 10.

Phoenix police told AZ Family, an exchange of gunfire erupted following a “verbal fight” between two groups of people outside the motel. Tragically, Ms. Perry succumbed to fatal injuries. Five others, ages 19 to 41, were transported to the hospital with injuries. Their identities and current conditions have not been released.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Motel guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the motel and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • What security measures, such as guarded-entry, monitored surveillance cameras, bright lighting, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Ms. Perry at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the motel owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Fiasia Perry’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss. Additionally, the surviving victims may pursue legal claims for their injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

https://www.legal-chronicle.com/files/2019/01/Screen-Shot-2019-01-10-at-2.18.03-AM-300x197.png

(WCIA 3)

Decatur, IL – January 4, 2019

Did negligent security contribute to the tragic loss of this young man and are justice and compensation available to Curtis Hairston’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Community leaders are calling for peace after 18-year-old Curtis Hairston was tragically killed inside a Decatur restaurant Friday evening, January 4, 2019.

According to the Herald & Review, gunfire erupted inside “Long John Silver’s, 701 W. Eldorado St.,” shortly before 6 p.m. Mr. Hairston was transported to the hospital, where he succumbed to fatal injuries. A second victim was “airlifted to HSHS St. John’s Hospital” with “life-threatening” injuries.

Police have not yet announced a suspect or motive, per WCIA 3 reports.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Restaurant patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

  • What security measures, such as weapons screenings, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security personnel, were in place to protect Mr. Hairston?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the restaurant owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss. Additionally, the surviving victim may pursue legal claims for injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

https://www.legal-chronicle.com/files/2018/12/Screen-Shot-2018-12-28-at-7.58.01-PM-300x231.png

(FOX 46)

Did negligent security contribute to this senseless loss of life and are justice and compensation available to Mr. Dunlap’s family?

Local News

28-year-old Zonta Monti Dunlap was shot and killed during an apparent robbery “at the Brookson Apartments” on Hambright Road in Huntersville Wednesday, December 26, 2018, according to WCCB Charlotte.

“A second man was transported to CMC Main with life threatening injuries,” per FOX 46 reports. His identity and current condition have not been released.

Police told WCCB Charlotte one suspect has been arrested on charges including “first degree murder” and “robbery with a dangerous weapon.” A second suspect has been identified.

Our Legal Take

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • How did the gunmen gain entry to the complex?
  • What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Zonta Monti Dunlap’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death. Additionally, the surviving victim may pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

We’ve Recovered Millions for Victims of Apartment Security Negligence…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.
Contact Information