Articles Tagged with 1900 block of 1st Avenue South

Francisco David Escatell Killed in Seattle, WA Nightclub Shooting.

Francisco David Escatell Killed in Seattle, WA Nightclub Shooting. (SeattleTimes.com)

Francisco David Escatell: Seattle, WA Nightclub Shooting. Preventable Tragedy?

The recent shooting at a Seattle nightclub raises serious questions about negligent security and potential legal claims for the victim.  Our firm has over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients.  Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Seattle, WA News

Gunfire rang out at a Seattle, WA nightclub early Saturday morning, August 17, 2024, leaving one man dead.

As reported by KING5.com, “Seattle police are investigating after one person was shot and killed inside a SODO nightclub early Saturday morning. The Seattle Police Department (SPD) said officers first responded to reports of a shooting just after 3 a.m. in the 1900 block of 1st Avenue South.”

According to the report, “[p]olice said the victim was shot inside a nightclub in the area by an unknown suspect who fled the scene. They said there was a delay between the time of the shooting and when it was reported to 911. Patrons of the nightclub had left before officers arrived on the scene.”

According to KOMOnews.com, “[t]he family of Francisco David Escatell, the victim in Saturday’s deadly nightclub shooting in SODO, is remembering the young man who was ‘taken too soon.'”

SeattleTimes.com is reporting, “[Francisco David Escatell] was taken to Harborview Medical Center in critical condition with a gunshot wound to his belly. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.”

The shooting remains under investigation.

Potential Legal Claims for family of Francisco David Escatell? Read Below for Information.

Our Legal Take

Top-100-Trial-Lawyers

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.

The following list questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  1. Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
  2. Was there security personnel at the property?
  3. Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
  4. Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
  5. Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?
  6. Does the property owner or management have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment?

Property owners and managers are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, or engaged in the negligent retention of its security personnel, the family of Francisco David Escatell may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection and investigation will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Francisco David Escatell retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

  • A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

Nightclub Shooting on First Avenue South in Seattle, WA Leaves One Man Dead.

Nightclub Shooting on First Avenue South in Seattle, WA Leaves One Man Dead. (SeattleTimes.com)

Could the shooting at a Seattle nightclub have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family? Our firm represents victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

Seattle, WA News

Gunfire rang out at a Seattle, WA nightclub early Saturday morning, August 17, 2024, leaving one man dead.

As reported by KING5.com, “Seattle police are investigating after one person was shot and killed inside a SODO nightclub early Saturday morning. The Seattle Police Department (SPD) said officers first responded to reports of a shooting just after 3 a.m. in the 1900 block of 1st Avenue South.”

According to the report, “[p]olice said the victim was shot inside a nightclub in the area by an unknown suspect who fled the scene. They said there was a delay between the time of the shooting and when it was reported to 911. Patrons of the nightclub had left before officers arrived on the scene.”

SeattleTimes.com is reporting, “[the victim] was taken to Harborview Medical Center in critical condition with a gunshot wound to his belly. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.”

The shooting remains under investigation.

Is Justice Available? Our Legal Take

Top-100-Trial-Lawyers

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.  The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  • Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
  • Was there security personnel at the property?
  • Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
  • Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious persons or suspicious activity on the property prior to the shooting?
  • Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?
  • Does the property owner or management have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment?

Property owners and managers are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, or engaged in the negligent retention of its security personnel, the family of the deceased victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection and investigation will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of the deceased victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

  • A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.
Contact Information